For violations of personal-data rights connected to Montenegro. The current law covers processing in Montenegro and certain foreign controllers using processing equipment there, not mere transit. Citizenship alone does not determine protection. Ask AZLP to check jurisdiction over a foreign platform; this is not a general account appeal.
AZLP can investigate and require correction of unlawful processing, prohibit processing or order deletion under Article 71. Article 47 also allows a written request for a temporary processing ban pending a decision where a violation is established or made plausible. Acceptance, compensation and account recovery are not guaranteed; a moderation disagreement alone is not a data-rights violation.
What to do
For access, correction or deletion, send the controller a written request and retain proof and its reply. Articles 43–44 set 15-day controller duties; Article 44 allows referral after refusal or failure to act. Article 47 separately permits a rights-protection request for an alleged violation, so do not assume a universal exhaustion requirement.
Use “Zahtjev za zaštitu prava” under personal-data forms. It requests name, address, phone, the entity responsible, a description, supporting documents, date and signature. Add relevant dates, screenshots and controller correspondence; explain the data right and remedy sought. Redact irrelevant third-party data. Never send passwords or complaint documents to ClearRules.
Download and complete the signed rights-protection form addressed to AZLP, Bulevar Revolucije 11, Podgorica. Confirm delivery arrangements with AZLP’s published contact before sending. Email acceptance, an online complaint portal and receipt were not verified. The controller-registration and freedom-of-information services are not this complaint route.
Checked 7 November 2026 against official forms and laws. Law 133/26 is published, but Article 106 delays application until six months after entry into force; it does not yet replace this procedure. Article 98 preserves the old rules for pending cases. Recheck before filing after the transition. No filing or receipt was tested; ClearRules collects no complaint documents.
Your connection to the country matters, not your account language. Individual bodies have additional requirements.
Montenegro · Access or protect personal data
All options by goal
Different routes seek different outcomes. Use a data or payment complaint only when that is the actual issue.
Choose a suitable option
Check what the service helps with and its requirements. Open a suitable option to see the steps and a link to the official website.
Requirements need checkingFor violations of personal-data rights connected to Montenegro. The current law covers processing in Montenegro and certain foreign controllers using processing equipment there, not mere transit. Citizenship alone does not determine protection. Ask AZLP to check jurisdiction over a foreign platform; this is not a general account appeal.Agencija za zaštitu ličnih podataka i slobodan pristup informacijama (AZLP)Checked 7 November 2026 against official forms and laws. Law 133/26 is published, but Article 106 delays application until six months after entry into force; it does not yet replace this procedure. Article 98 preserves the old rules for pending cases.Cost: No AZLP complaint fee was verified. Article 46 makes controllers bear the costs of Articles 43–44 requests unless another law provides otherwise; that does not establish the fee for an AZLP complaint. Ask before paying.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Agencija za zaštitu ličnih podataka i slobodan pristup informacijama (AZLP)
What this route offers: For violations of personal-data rights connected to Montenegro. The current law covers processing in Montenegro and certain foreign controllers using processing equipment there, not mere transit. Citizenship alone does not determine protection. Ask AZLP to check jurisdiction over a foreign platform; this is not a general account appeal.
Checked 7 November 2026 against official forms and laws. Law 133/26 is published, but Article 106 delays application until six months after entry into force; it does not yet replace this procedure. Article 98 preserves the old rules for pending cases. Recheck before filing after the transition. No filing or receipt was tested; ClearRules collects no complaint documents.
AZLP can investigate and require correction of unlawful processing, prohibit processing or order deletion under Article 71. Article 47 also allows a written request for a temporary processing ban pending a decision where a violation is established or made plausible. Acceptance, compensation and account recovery are not guaranteed; a moderation disagreement alone is not a data-rights violation.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
AZLP can investigate and require correction of unlawful processing, prohibit processing or order deletion under Article 71. Article 47 also allows a written request for a temporary processing ban pending a decision where a violation is established or made plausible. Acceptance, compensation and account recovery are not guaranteed; a moderation disagreement alone is not a data-rights violation.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
For access, correction or deletion, send the controller a written request and retain proof and its reply. Articles 43–44 set 15-day controller duties; Article 44 allows referral after refusal or failure to act. Article 47 separately permits a rights-protection request for an alleged violation, so do not assume a universal exhaustion requirement.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Under the presently applicable Article 47, AZLP must decide within 60 days of filing. This is a statutory decision period, not a guaranteed outcome or the filing deadline. No general complaint-filing limit was verified. Seek prompt advice on your dates and any judicial deadline.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
No AZLP complaint fee was verified. Article 46 makes controllers bear the costs of Articles 43–44 requests unless another law provides otherwise; that does not establish the fee for an AZLP complaint. Ask before paying.Sources for these requirementsNot confirmed
The official form and legal texts reviewed are in Montenegrin. Accepted filing languages, translation requirements and assistance for other languages were not verified. Ask AZLP before relying on an English or translated submission.Sources for these requirementsNot confirmed
Download and complete the signed rights-protection form addressed to AZLP, Bulevar Revolucije 11, Podgorica. Confirm delivery arrangements with AZLP’s published contact before sending. Email acceptance, an online complaint portal and receipt were not verified. The controller-registration and freedom-of-information services are not this complaint route.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
For access, correction or deletion, send the controller a written request and retain proof and its reply. Articles 43–44 set 15-day controller duties; Article 44 allows referral after refusal or failure to act. Article 47 separately permits a rights-protection request for an alleged violation, so do not assume a universal exhaustion requirement.
Use “Zahtjev za zaštitu prava” under personal-data forms. It requests name, address, phone, the entity responsible, a description, supporting documents, date and signature. Add relevant dates, screenshots and controller correspondence; explain the data right and remedy sought. Redact irrelevant third-party data. Never send passwords or complaint documents to ClearRules.
Download and complete the signed rights-protection form addressed to AZLP, Bulevar Revolucije 11, Podgorica. Confirm delivery arrangements with AZLP’s published contact before sending. Email acceptance, an online complaint portal and receipt were not verified. The controller-registration and freedom-of-information services are not this complaint route.
Download and complete the signed rights-protection form addressed to AZLP, Bulevar Revolucije 11, Podgorica. Confirm delivery arrangements with AZLP’s published contact before sending. Email acceptance, an online complaint portal and receipt were not verified. The controller-registration and freedom-of-information services are not this complaint route.
What to prepare
Use “Zahtjev za zaštitu prava” under personal-data forms. It requests name, address, phone, the entity responsible, a description, supporting documents, date and signature. Add relevant dates, screenshots and controller correspondence; explain the data right and remedy sought. Redact irrelevant third-party data. Never send passwords or complaint documents to ClearRules.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Under the presently applicable Article 47, AZLP must decide within 60 days of filing. This is a statutory decision period, not a guaranteed outcome or the filing deadline. No general complaint-filing limit was verified. Seek prompt advice on your dates and any judicial deadline.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
Keep the signed request, attachments and delivery proof; ask for a case reference and respond to AZLP’s requests. Article 47 allows an administrative-court challenge to the decision. Check the decision’s appeal instructions promptly; a court-filing deadline was not verified here. Article 68 permits an objection to the inspection record within eight days of receiving it.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Does every country have an account-recovery route?
We have not confirmed that every country has an account-recovery process outside Meta. This directory covers the listed countries, with options for data, payments, harmful content and, where available, account restrictions and court claims. Several links do not mean several ways to restore an account. We state when no suitable option has been found.
The review covers the entries in this directory. It does not establish that every possible route has been found. An accessible page, an applicable procedure and a successful outcome are different things.
How to use this directory
Different bodies handle different issues. A refused data request, a payment dispute and an account appeal involve separate procedures. Choose the one that matches your situation. The body you contact decides whether to accept the case and what action to take.
Each card shows when its sources were researched. No real complaints were submitted.
Country and topic appear in the page address. Do not upload documents, passwords or codes here.