This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
What to do
Check ACE’s requirements
You are located in an EU member state and are at least 16.
The platform decision was made within the last six months. Check the date of that decision.
Submissions and correspondence are accepted in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Polish or Dutch. This is separate from the language of the disputed content.
An account, Page or group restriction must require reviewing one or more pieces of content. Being unable to sign in alone does not make a case eligible.
An internal Meta appeal is encouraged, but you do not have to file one or wait for its result before contacting ACE. If you have appealed, keep that information.
Which cases are outside scope
Impersonating another person, brand or organisation; account removals based on minimum age; identity-verification requests and outcomes.
Hacked or compromised access; behaviour-only decisions; suspension solely through linkage to another suspended account; technical or automated spam.
Content removals based on copyright or other intellectual-property claims; suspected sharing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Check ACE’s rules separately for other CSE categories.
Check the restrictions if the same dispute is already before another out-of-court dispute body or a competent court. That is different from an internal Meta appeal.
This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
Keep the notice, decision date and disputed content link. If you have contacted Meta, prepare that information. Check whether another dispute body or court is handling the same case.
Check the conditions and exclusions above, then read ACE’s current rules. On ACE’s site, choose the dispute submission option and follow its questions.
If you submit a dispute, keep its confirmation and reference. Reply within the same case and do not create a duplicate ACE submission.
ACE covers content decisions and related account, page and group restrictions on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Google Maps, Pinterest and Threads. You must be in the EU, aged 16+, with an enforcement decision from the last six months. Currently free; an internal appeal is encouraged but optional. Decisions are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
An EU connection is required, and the notice must be no more than 12 months old. Meta’s child sexual exploitation (CSE) category is excluded; its Integrity category is only partly covered. This route does not cover hack recovery or spam based solely on user behaviour. Check the remaining exclusions and content language: English, German, French or Italian. Free, without a guaranteed outcome.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
For EU residents and organisations. File before 12 months from the event, after complaining to the platform. If unanswered, attach proof of that complaint. Free, except possible costs for bad-faith complaints. Decisions are non-binding; ordinary damages require a separate court route.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
File an EU-connected moderation dispute with ADROIT within one year of the platform decision. Free except bad-faith or vexatious complaints; outcomes are non-binding. Its rules usually allow filing without internal appeal, but the FAQ says to try it first: confirm this requirement. Webform filing only.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
For supported platforms; content and proceedings must be German or English. File within one year. Internal appeal is optional. An EU connection is needed, but the rules conflict on citizenship: non-EU/EEA citizens should confirm access. Free except clearly bad-faith complaints; decisions are non-binding.
Check the dispute’s subject: CEAH reviews platform terms and content illegality under Czech or Slovak law. Its remit does not automatically cover every country’s law. Decisions are non-binding; do not duplicate a pending or already decided dispute before another body.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
CEAH reviews content, account and monetisation disputes. Complain to the platform first. Slovak, Czech or English. Normally free; bad faith may attract a fee. Outcomes are non-binding. The FAQ’s six-month limit is unclear: confirm it before filing.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
A free procedure for users in the EU, in Czech, Slovak or English. Choose “Podat stížnost”. A reference ID is helpful but optional. If you do not have one, describe the account and attach the notices. This body does not require a prior appeal to the platform.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
A Hungarian-language DSA procedure. After an unsuccessful complaint to the platform, complete the application in Eljárás. Submit it in writing, including by the email address given there. An email without the required details and attachments is insufficient.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
RTR accepts DSA complaints in German through eRTR after you contact the platform. Normally free, with a clearly bad-faith fee exception. The filing window depends on the internal complaint decision; confirm borderline dates. Outcomes are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
ADR Point handles account, content, service and monetisation restrictions. First use the platform’s internal complaint process. Select the platform and EU residence in its form; attach notices and correspondence. Free except bad-faith cases; decisions are non-binding. Thirteen languages are offered, with English fallback if no assessor is available. Do not file the same case with another ODS body.
The dispute must concern content illegality under Irish law. The same dispute must not be pending in court, pending before another ODS body or already decided by another ODS body. Impress decisions are non-binding and do not guarantee platform compliance.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Impress reviews illegal-content decisions under Irish law and related account restrictions. You need an EU connection, a supported platform and English-language content. Filing is also in English and free; internal appeal is optional. Check exclusions: outcomes are non-binding and restoration is not guaranteed.
This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
What to do
Check ACE’s requirements
You are located in an EU member state and are at least 16.
The platform decision was made within the last six months. Check the date of that decision.
Submissions and correspondence are accepted in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Polish or Dutch. This is separate from the language of the disputed content.
An account, Page or group restriction must require reviewing one or more pieces of content. Being unable to sign in alone does not make a case eligible.
An internal Meta appeal is encouraged, but you do not have to file one or wait for its result before contacting ACE. If you have appealed, keep that information.
Which cases are outside scope
Impersonating another person, brand or organisation; account removals based on minimum age; identity-verification requests and outcomes.
Hacked or compromised access; behaviour-only decisions; suspension solely through linkage to another suspended account; technical or automated spam.
Content removals based on copyright or other intellectual-property claims; suspected sharing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Check ACE’s rules separately for other CSE categories.
Check the restrictions if the same dispute is already before another out-of-court dispute body or a competent court. That is different from an internal Meta appeal.
This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
Keep the notice, decision date and disputed content link. If you have contacted Meta, prepare that information. Check whether another dispute body or court is handling the same case.
Check the conditions and exclusions above, then read ACE’s current rules. On ACE’s site, choose the dispute submission option and follow its questions.
If you submit a dispute, keep its confirmation and reference. Reply within the same case and do not create a duplicate ACE submission.
ACE covers content decisions and related account, page and group restrictions on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Google Maps, Pinterest and Threads. You must be in the EU, aged 16+, with an enforcement decision from the last six months. Currently free; an internal appeal is encouraged but optional. Decisions are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
An EU connection is required, and the notice must be no more than 12 months old. Meta’s child sexual exploitation (CSE) category is excluded; its Integrity category is only partly covered. This route does not cover hack recovery or spam based solely on user behaviour. Check the remaining exclusions and content language: English, German, French or Italian. Free, without a guaranteed outcome.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
For EU residents and organisations. File before 12 months from the event, after complaining to the platform. If unanswered, attach proof of that complaint. Free, except possible costs for bad-faith complaints. Decisions are non-binding; ordinary damages require a separate court route.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
File an EU-connected moderation dispute with ADROIT within one year of the platform decision. Free except bad-faith or vexatious complaints; outcomes are non-binding. Its rules usually allow filing without internal appeal, but the FAQ says to try it first: confirm this requirement. Webform filing only.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
For supported platforms; content and proceedings must be German or English. File within one year. Internal appeal is optional. An EU connection is needed, but the rules conflict on citizenship: non-EU/EEA citizens should confirm access. Free except clearly bad-faith complaints; decisions are non-binding.
Check the dispute’s subject: CEAH reviews platform terms and content illegality under Czech or Slovak law. Its remit does not automatically cover every country’s law. Decisions are non-binding; do not duplicate a pending or already decided dispute before another body.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
CEAH reviews content, account and monetisation disputes. Complain to the platform first. Slovak, Czech or English. Normally free; bad faith may attract a fee. Outcomes are non-binding. The FAQ’s six-month limit is unclear: confirm it before filing.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
A free procedure for users in the EU, in Czech, Slovak or English. Choose “Podat stížnost”. A reference ID is helpful but optional. If you do not have one, describe the account and attach the notices. This body does not require a prior appeal to the platform.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
A Hungarian-language DSA procedure. After an unsuccessful complaint to the platform, complete the application in Eljárás. Submit it in writing, including by the email address given there. An email without the required details and attachments is insufficient.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
RTR accepts DSA complaints in German through eRTR after you contact the platform. Normally free, with a clearly bad-faith fee exception. The filing window depends on the internal complaint decision; confirm borderline dates. Outcomes are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
ADR Point handles account, content, service and monetisation restrictions. First use the platform’s internal complaint process. Select the platform and EU residence in its form; attach notices and correspondence. Free except bad-faith cases; decisions are non-binding. Thirteen languages are offered, with English fallback if no assessor is available. Do not file the same case with another ODS body.
The dispute must concern content illegality under Irish law. The same dispute must not be pending in court, pending before another ODS body or already decided by another ODS body. Impress decisions are non-binding and do not guarantee platform compliance.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Impress reviews illegal-content decisions under Irish law and related account restrictions. You need an EU connection, a supported platform and English-language content. Filing is also in English and free; internal appeal is optional. Check exclusions: outcomes are non-binding and restoration is not guaranteed.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
What to do
Open Meta’s final post decision and find the reference ID. Without it, this route is unavailable.
Choose Submit an Appeal on the Board’s site, sign in to your active account and submit within Meta’s stated deadline.
Check Track Your Appeal. Submitting does not mean the Board will select the case.
For eligible content decisions only: requires an active account, Meta’s final decision and a Meta-issued reference ID. The Board selects a limited number of cases. If the account is disabled and you cannot log in, this route does not fit.
The coordinator oversees DSA compliance and may forward the complaint to the competent body. This is not an individual appeal on the merits of a restriction or a promise of recovery.
What to do
If a reporting route is available, tell the platform about the issue. Save its response or a screenshot showing the missing option.
In the local DSA process, explain what failed: the explanation, complaint option or handling of your complaint. Attach evidence.
Keep the submission confirmation and reference number. If asked for more information, reply within the same case.
For example, a platform restricted your account without explaining why or failed to provide the required way to appeal.
This route concerns data rights. Being unable to log in does not by itself prove a breach: this is not an account-recovery service. Investigations and remedies depend on local law.
What to do
Describe the specific data issue. For access requests, first ask Meta for the data and keep a copy of your request.
Check local deadlines and requirements. Attach your request and reply, and explain which data rights were affected.
Keep the submission confirmation and reference number. If asked for more information, reply within the same case.
ÚOOÚ provides a data-processing complaint form. Postal and electronic submissions have signature requirements; do not assume an ordinary unsigned email is sufficient.
First identify the seller on the receipt: it may be Meta, Apple, Google or another company. A payment complaint does not guarantee account recovery.
What to do
Write to the seller: what you paid for, what went wrong and what remedy you want. Keep the reply.
Check whether the local body accepts disputes with that seller. Give the facts and amount, and attach the receipt.
Keep the submission confirmation and reference number. If asked for more information, reply within the same case.
For a consumer dispute with a trader in another EU country, Norway or Iceland. Contact the ECC in your country of residence with the contract, proof of payment and correspondence. This is free help with settlement, not a binding account appeal or support for businesses.
First check where the company is registered, which remedies are available and the rules for taking part. A mediator and a court have different powers.
What to do
Check the conditions below. If you must first try to resolve the issue with the company, keep evidence of that attempt.
Name the correct company, state a specific remedy and attach evidence.
Keep the submission confirmation and reference number. If asked for more information, reply within the same case.
Use ČOI’s linked ADR form with proof of an unsuccessful complaint. Apply within one year of first raising the claim with the trader. Confirm jurisdiction over the foreign company before filing; ECC Czechia can be the starting point for cross-border disputes.
The dispute must concern content illegality under Irish law. The same dispute must not be pending in court, pending before another ODS body or already decided by another ODS body. Impress decisions are non-binding and do not guarantee platform compliance.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Impress reviews illegal-content decisions under Irish law and related account restrictions. You need an EU connection, a supported platform and English-language content. Filing is also in English and free; internal appeal is optional. Check exclusions: outcomes are non-binding and restoration is not guaranteed.
StopNCII.orgInternational service · specific conditions
Help limit intimate-image sharing
The service helps limit sharing on partner platforms. It cannot remove everything from the internet or restore an account.
What to do
Check your age when the image was made and the service’s conditions.
On the official site, use only material already on your device. You do not need to send the file itself.
Keep the case details and follow the instructions for checking progress.
For intimate images of you taken at 18+, including threatened sharing. You need the file on your device. It stays there; a digital fingerprint is shared. Coverage is limited to participating public-facing platforms, not the whole internet or encrypted messages. Keep your case number and PIN.
The service helps limit sharing on partner platforms. It cannot remove everything from the internet or restore an account.
What to do
Check your age when the image was made and the service’s conditions.
On the official site, use only material already on your device. You do not need to send the file itself.
Keep the case details and follow the instructions for checking progress.
For intimate images of you taken before age 18, even if you are now an adult. Use only a file already on your device: do not download or forward material to apply. Works on participating public or unencrypted platforms.
Small claims often concern monetary claims. The court may not have power to order account restoration. Consider fees, costs, deadlines, contract terms and local rules.
What to do
Read your region’s court rules. Check jurisdiction, claim limits and available remedies.
Identify the correct defendant and service procedure. Prepare a timeline, evidence and an amount based on documented losses.
Check required pre-action steps and fees. Use the court’s own form; this guide is not a court filing.
For eligible cross-border civil and commercial claims up to €5,000; Denmark does not participate. Use Form A. Check jurisdiction, court language, fees and the remedy separately. Completing a form online does not necessarily file it electronically with the court.
Your connection to the country matters, not your account language. Individual bodies have additional requirements.
Czechia · Appeal the removal of a post
All options by goal
Different routes seek different outcomes. Use a data or payment complaint only when that is the actual issue.
Help me choose the next step
Answer only what you know. We compare your answers with researched conditions; the recipient makes the final eligibility decision.
Worth checking for your case: 0 · Requirements need checking: 12 · Does not fit the stated answer: 0
No confirmed matching option was found for these answers. Correct only an inaccurate answer or check requirements with the recipient.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Choose a suitable option
Check what the service helps with and its requirements. Open a suitable option to see the steps and a link to the official website.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionAppeals Centre EuropeACE covers content decisions and related account, page and group restrictions on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Google Maps, Pinterest and Threads. You must be in the EU, aged 16+, with an enforcement decision from the last six months.Cost: Filing is currently free.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Appeals Centre Europe
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
ACE covers content decisions and related account, page and group restrictions on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Google Maps, Pinterest and Threads. You must be in the EU, aged 16+, with an enforcement decision from the last six months. Currently free; an internal appeal is encouraged but optional. Decisions are non-binding.
Check ACE’s requirements
You are located in an EU member state and are at least 16.
The platform decision was made within the last six months. Check the date of that decision.
Submissions and correspondence are accepted in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Polish or Dutch. This is separate from the language of the disputed content.
An account, Page or group restriction must require reviewing one or more pieces of content. Being unable to sign in alone does not make a case eligible.
An internal Meta appeal is encouraged, but you do not have to file one or wait for its result before contacting ACE. If you have appealed, keep that information.
Which cases are outside scope
Impersonating another person, brand or organisation; account removals based on minimum age; identity-verification requests and outcomes.
Hacked or compromised access; behaviour-only decisions; suspension solely through linkage to another suspended account; technical or automated spam.
Content removals based on copyright or other intellectual-property claims; suspected sharing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Check ACE’s rules separately for other CSE categories.
Check the restrictions if the same dispute is already before another out-of-court dispute body or a competent court. That is different from an internal Meta appeal.
This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
This is a short eligibility check, not confirmation that your case will be accepted or your account restored. Read the full rules and check ACE’s current information before submitting.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
ACE does not review hacking or lost access as such, or intellectual-property disputes. For other cases, check the supported content category and exclusions separately.
ACE reviews enforcement of platform content policies, not content legality. If the notice mentions illegality, check whether there is a separate supported content-policy ground. Mentioning law alone establishes neither eligibility nor exclusion of a mixed dispute.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Independent merits review with a non-binding decision. Restoration is not guaranteed.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
You must be located in the EU and aged 16+. The dispute must concern supported platform/content decisions; an account restriction must require content review. An internal appeal is optional. Check exclusions and parallel proceedings.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
The platform enforcement decision must be within the last six months. Check the boundary date under ACE’s rules.Date of the platform enforcement decision.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Filing and correspondence: English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Polish or Dutch. Check the disputed content’s language separately.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
The portal asks for a decision reference or username/content URL and a statement up to 3,500 characters. Login and end-to-end submission were not tested.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Keep the notice, decision date and disputed content link. If you have contacted Meta, prepare that information. Check whether another dispute body or court is handling the same case.
Check the conditions and exclusions above, then read ACE’s current rules. On ACE’s site, choose the dispute submission option and follow its questions.
If you submit a dispute, keep its confirmation and reference. Reply within the same case and do not create a duplicate ACE submission.
Keep the notice, decision date and disputed content link. If you have contacted Meta, prepare that information. Check whether another dispute body or court is handling the same case.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionUser RightsAn EU connection is required, and the notice must be no more than 12 months old. Meta’s child sexual exploitation (CSE) category is excluded; its Integrity category is only partly covered.Cost: Filing is free.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
User Rights
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
An EU connection is required, and the notice must be no more than 12 months old. Meta’s child sexual exploitation (CSE) category is excluded; its Integrity category is only partly covered. This route does not cover hack recovery or spam based solely on user behaviour. Check the remaining exclusions and content language: English, German, French or Italian. Free, without a guaranteed outcome.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Independent review with a non-binding decision; restoration is not guaranteed.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
EU location or a registered EU address; supported platform, exact category and content language. Hacking, behavioural automation and DMs are excluded; Account Integrity/Spam/monetisation are only partly covered. A mandatory prior internal appeal was not established.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
No more than 12 months after receiving the restriction notice. This is not necessarily the restriction date.Date the restriction notice was received.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
The accepted filing language was not separately verified. Verified disputed-content languages are English, German, French and Italian.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
One complaint per moderation notice. Prepare the notice showing date, reason and action, plus relevant screenshots. Login and submission were not tested.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionADR CenterFor EU residents and organisations. File before 12 months from the event, after complaining to the platform. If unanswered, attach proof of that complaint. Free, except possible costs for bad-faith complaints.Cost: Free; bad-faith complaints can lead to costs.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
ADR Center
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
For EU residents and organisations. File before 12 months from the event, after complaining to the platform. If unanswered, attach proof of that complaint. Free, except possible costs for bad-faith complaints. Decisions are non-binding; ordinary damages require a separate court route.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Independent review. The decision is non-binding; ADR Center cannot restore the account itself.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
EU residence or establishment. Complain to the platform first; attach proof. Check restrictions on duplicate and parallel cases.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
English or an available EU language. Website languages exceed the certification list: confirm your choice.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionADROITFile an EU-connected moderation dispute with ADROIT within one year of the platform decision. Free except bad-faith or vexatious complaints; outcomes are non-binding.Cost: Free, except vexatious or clearly bad-faith complaints.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
ADROIT
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
File an EU-connected moderation dispute with ADROIT within one year of the platform decision. Free except bad-faith or vexatious complaints; outcomes are non-binding. Its rules usually allow filing without internal appeal, but the FAQ says to try it first: confirm this requirement. Webform filing only.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Review of the platform decision; the recommendation is non-binding.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Content needs an EU connection. The rules normally allow filing without an internal appeal, but the FAQ says to try it first. Confirm this. Check age, scope and other proceedings. Content-sharing disputes only; behaviour unrelated to sharing information is excluded.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch or Maltese. Decisions are issued in English.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionPlatform ControlFor supported platforms; content and proceedings must be German or English. File within one year. Internal appeal is optional. An EU connection is needed, but the rules conflict on citizenship: non-EU/EEA citizens should confirm access.Cost: Free. A clearly bad-faith complaint can incur €50 plus VAT.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Platform Control
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
For supported platforms; content and proceedings must be German or English. File within one year. Internal appeal is optional. An EU connection is needed, but the rules conflict on citizenship: non-EU/EEA citizens should confirm access. Free except clearly bad-faith complaints; decisions are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Legal review of moderation or failure to act. The decision is non-binding.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
An EU connection and supported platform are required; internal appeal is optional. The rules conflict on citizenship: non-EU/EEA citizens need clarification. Check age and other cases.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
One year after the platform action; the rules also say 365 days. Confirm a borderline date.Date of the disputed platform action.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionCentral European Appeals HubCEAH reviews content, account and monetisation disputes. Complain to the platform first. Slovak, Czech or English. Normally free; bad faith may attract a fee. Outcomes are non-binding. The FAQ’s six-month limit is unclear: confirm it before filing.Cost: Normally free. The fee schedule allows a charge for clear bad faith; no amount is stated.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Central European Appeals Hub
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
CEAH reviews content, account and monetisation disputes. Complain to the platform first. Slovak, Czech or English. Normally free; bad faith may attract a fee. Outcomes are non-binding. The FAQ’s six-month limit is unclear: confirm it before filing.
Check the dispute’s subject: CEAH reviews platform terms and content illegality under Czech or Slovak law. Its remit does not automatically cover every country’s law. Decisions are non-binding; do not duplicate a pending or already decided dispute before another body.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Non-binding review under platform rules or Czech or Slovak law.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Use the platform complaint process first. Under-18s need adult representation. No parallel or already decided dispute elsewhere.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionDigitální ombudsman (IH21)A free procedure for users in the EU, in Czech, Slovak or English. Choose “Podat stížnost”. A reference ID is helpful but optional. If you do not have one, describe the account and attach the notices. This body does not require a prior appeal to the platform.Cost: Free for the complainant, whatever the outcome.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Digitální ombudsman (IH21)
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
A free procedure for users in the EU, in Czech, Slovak or English. Choose “Podat stížnost”. A reference ID is helpful but optional. If you do not have one, describe the account and attach the notices. This body does not require a prior appeal to the platform.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
An independent ombudsman issues a non-binding decision. Court action remains available.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Internal appeal and case reference are optional. Identity and electronic contact details are required. Small and micro platforms are generally excluded.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionOnline Platform Vitarendező TanácsA Hungarian-language DSA procedure. After an unsuccessful complaint to the platform, complete the application in Eljárás. Submit it in writing, including by the email address given there. An email without the required details and attachments is insufficient.Cost: The current applicant filing fee is HUF 0.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Online Platform Vitarendező Tanács
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
A Hungarian-language DSA procedure. After an unsuccessful complaint to the platform, complete the application in Eljárás. Submit it in writing, including by the email address given there. An email without the required details and attachments is insufficient.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Helps reach a settlement. Without the platform accepting a binding outcome, it normally issues a recommendation.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
First try to resolve it and use the platform’s internal complaint process. Attach its reply or proof of trying. The same dispute must not be pending or decided elsewhere.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Normally 6 months from the disputed event. If discovered later or filing was prevented: 6 months from discovery/end of the obstacle, capped at one year from the event.Event giving rise to the dispute; exceptions use later discovery or the end of an obstacle.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Signed application by post or email; electronic filing requires an electronic signature. A PDF form is available. Submission was not tested.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionRTR — DSA dispute resolutionRTR accepts DSA complaints in German through eRTR after you contact the platform. Normally free, with a clearly bad-faith fee exception. The filing window depends on the internal complaint decision; confirm borderline dates. Outcomes are non-binding.Cost: Normally free. Clearly malicious complaints may incur a €51.69 fee, net of taxes.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
RTR — DSA dispute resolution
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
RTR accepts DSA complaints in German through eRTR after you contact the platform. Normally free, with a clearly bad-faith fee exception. The filing window depends on the internal complaint decision; confirm borderline dates. Outcomes are non-binding.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Mediation and a non-binding decision. RTR cannot remove content itself.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Complain to the platform first and attach correspondence. Disclose other proceedings: another DSA body’s final decision or a current/past court or consumer-ADR case may prevent filing. The rules differ on earlier filings; confirm with RTR.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
180 days after receiving the internal complaint decision. If none: six months after the original platform decision. The refusal section also says six months: confirm borderline dates with RTR.Receipt of the internal complaint decision; if none, the date of the original platform decision.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionADR PointADR Point handles account, content, service and monetisation restrictions. First use the platform’s internal complaint process. Select the platform and EU residence in its form; attach notices and correspondence.Requirements, deadlines and documents: Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
ADR Point
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
ADR Point handles account, content, service and monetisation restrictions. First use the platform’s internal complaint process. Select the platform and EU residence in its form; attach notices and correspondence. Free except bad-faith cases; decisions are non-binding. Thirteen languages are offered, with English fallback if no assessor is available. Do not file the same case with another ODS body.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
Prerequisites
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
Deadline and starting event
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
Cost
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
Filing language
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
Access and sign-in
Not confirmed. Check with the recipient.
What to do
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionImpress Dispute ResolutionsImpress reviews illegal-content decisions under Irish law and related account restrictions. You need an EU connection, a supported platform and English-language content. Filing is also in English and free; internal appeal is optional.Cost: Filing and review are free.Steps and full conditions
Regional route · check eligibility
Impress Dispute Resolutions
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
Impress reviews illegal-content decisions under Irish law and related account restrictions. You need an EU connection, a supported platform and English-language content. Filing is also in English and free; internal appeal is optional. Check exclusions: outcomes are non-binding and restoration is not guaranteed.
The dispute must concern content illegality under Irish law. The same dispute must not be pending in court, pending before another ODS body or already decided by another ODS body. Impress decisions are non-binding and do not guarantee platform compliance.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Independent decision; the platform is not bound to follow it. Restoration or payment is not guaranteed.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
An Irish-law illegality dispute and EU connection are required. The form excludes content involving under-18s, although the FAQ permits an adult representative for a child: confirm eligibility. Internal appeal is optional; check other proceedings.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Eligibility check, then online form. Draft-saving guidance conflicts: prepare documents first. Submission was not tested.Sources for these requirementsPartly confirmed
Save the dated notice identifying the account or post and stated reason.
Check the body’s country, language, decision type and prior-appeal requirements. Open its form using the link below and specify what you want reviewed.
Keep the submission receipt. Add requested documents to the existing case; check both the decision and its implementation by the platform.
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
These services have their own requirements. Their availability does not mean that your country has a local body that handles account recovery.
Requirements need checkingIndependent review of an eligible decisionOversight BoardFor eligible content decisions only: requires an active account, Meta’s final decision and a Meta-issued reference ID. The Board selects a limited number of cases. If the account is disabled and you cannot log in, this route does not fit.Cost: The filing fee was not established from the reviewed evidence. Check with the recipient.Steps and full conditions
International service · specific conditions
Oversight Board
What this route offers: Independent review of an eligible decision
You want a decision about your account or post reviewed. Availability depends on country, subject, decision date and the recipient’s rules.
For eligible content decisions only: requires an active account, Meta’s final decision and a Meta-issued reference ID. The Board selects a limited number of cases. If the account is disabled and you cannot log in, this route does not fit.
A review does not guarantee reversal. Do not duplicate a submission while the same case is still awaiting a response.
Why this result
Requirements need checking
Not all requirements for this route are represented in the matcher. Check the recipient’s full instructions.
Internal content review is required first. Ordinary support contact does not establish a final decision or the required Meta reference.
This is preliminary matching, not eligibility confirmation or a success estimate.
Requirements, deadlines and documents
Possible remedy
Decisions in selected content cases are binding on Meta; policy recommendations have a different status. Selection and restoration are not guaranteed.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Complete internal content review and obtain the final decision with a Meta reference. An active account is required; ordinary disabled-account recovery is not available here. Only selected cases are reviewed.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Check the deadline in Meta’s notice. A universal 15-day limit was not verified in this review.Eligible final Meta decision and its notice; verify the exact timing rule.Sources for these requirementsNot confirmed
Filing language was not verified. The website language or an available translation does not establish an accepted filing language.Sources for these requirementsNot confirmed
Requires login to an active Facebook/Instagram account and a Meta-issued reference for an eligible decision. The authenticated form was not inspected.Sources for these requirementsConfirmed by the source
Account links or IDs, dates, notices, your requests and replies. For payments, keep the receipt and seller’s name.
What to do after applying
No reply yet
Check the submission confirmation, your spam folder and the service’s case portal. Look up its stated response time. If that time has passed, ask for an update and include your existing case reference, if you have one.
Your application was not accepted
Read the reason. A case outside the body’s powers, missing documents and a decision against your claim call for different next steps. Correct the stated gaps or follow the appeal instructions in the reply. Check the appeal deadline before submitting again.
You have a reply, but the issue remains
If the decision supports you, keep the full decision and case number. Ask the body how to track implementation and attach it to your existing Meta case. A favourable decision and actual restoration are separate stages.
Official source and review details
We have reviewed the official instructions. Check the current requirements and whether the form is available before submitting.
Sources researched: No real complaints were submitted.
Latest source check: Official material was read. This does not test complaint submission or confirm that your case qualifies.
Individual cases highlight possible difficulties, not success rates. User accounts have not been verified against case records; official case studies are labelled separately.
Official case study
A group was restored after independent review
Appeals Centre Europe reports a case where Facebook restored a group after receiving its decision. This documents an individual result, not an appeal success rate or implementation of every decision.
What this means for you: Keep the decision and check exactly what was restored. A profile, Page and group may each be the subject of a separate dispute.
A Reddit user reports a favourable DSA decision in June 2026 but no restored access by August. We have not verified the case documents; legal assertions in the discussion are not established facts.
What this means for you: Distinguish a decision from its implementation. Keep it, then assess the relevant supervisory or court route instead of duplicating the case across mediators.
We read the full account. This is the author’s experience; case documents were not independently verified.
Does every country have an account-recovery route?
We have not confirmed that every country has an account-recovery process outside Meta. This directory covers the listed countries, with options for data, payments, harmful content and, where available, account restrictions and court claims. Several links do not mean several ways to restore an account. We state when no suitable option has been found.
The review covers the entries in this directory. It does not establish that every possible route has been found. An accessible page, an applicable procedure and a successful outcome are different things.
How to use this directory
Different bodies handle different issues. A refused data request, a payment dispute and an account appeal involve separate procedures. Choose the one that matches your situation. The body you contact decides whether to accept the case and what action to take.
Each card shows when its sources were researched. No real complaints were submitted.
Country and topic appear in the page address. Do not upload documents, passwords or codes here.